All Posts

The Summer Theatre Died – Part One

Dunkirk NY – Recently, I went down a rabbit hole of theatrical news and information. I did so because the news of theatres closing and shrinking across the country was front and center this past summer, and I wanted to see if I could find out more about the causes. Down somewhere at the very depths of this particular rabbit hole, I found a Substack written by a former collaborator and theatre blogger from back in the 2000s. His name is Scott Walters, and his substack has the same name as his former blog – Theatre Ideas. I was also at that time writing my own blog entitled A Poor Player, and we started corresponding. We found we had similar interests and background, as we were both academics who had come to believe that the academic model for theatre departments was, to put it bluntly, based on a collection of myths and outright lies. We decided to collaborate on a presentation for the 2014 (I believe) Southeast Theatre Conference. Our presentation was based on facts and statistics we had collected demonstrating the statistical odds against a theatre student becoming a successful actor, and why theatre departments should pivot away from the “pre-professional” model of training and begin to develop educational models that emphasized personal empowerment for theatre artists in creating their own work and creating a smaller, sustainable career model that emphasized, not stardom, but a sustainable creative life and lifestyle. After that presentation, though, we drifted apart as I retired, and then he went on to pursue other interests until he retired as well. It has only been recently that I discovered he has begun writing again about theatre, and basically putting forward many of the same ideas we suggested in that presentation.

I mention all this because Scott has recently released an ebook entitled Building a Sustainable Theatre: How to Remove Gatekeepers and Take Control of your Artistic Career. I read it, and it made me – well, the best word I have found to describe my reaction is sad. I became sad when I realized, upon finishing reading it, that the book is 10-15 years too late. If it had come out in 2010, it would have been revolutionary. In 2023, however, the book has no relevance, not because it’s a bad book with bad ideas – far from it. It’s just that theatre, as an art form, is dying, and despite the book’s good intentions, its fundamental premises and suggestions don’t apply to the 2023 realities of theatre.

I am hoping with this series of essays (and I don’t know yet how many I will write) to explain why I think theatre is an art form on serious life support, and perhaps should have its plug pulled. I am extremely pessimistic about the short-term viability of theatre, and I have no idea at all where theatre will find itself in the long term. There is clearly an entropic spiral taking place at the moment, and the unrelenting news over this past summer detailing theatres reducing offerings and/or closing altogether was stunning in its scope. I don’t know what to say to people anymore who ask me about theatre and the state thereof, and I also don’t know what to make anymore of my career as a lifelong theatre artist.

I don’t think I am going to shed any new light here. Rather, I think this series of essays will more like a purge of thoughts, feelings, and observations about where theatre is at today. I don’t have solutions. I don’t intend to look for any. Whatever solutions lie out there will probably come to fruition after I’ve passed on. The issues in theatre are inextricably tied to the cultural climate we find ourselves in now – divided and uncertain. I can only say this for certain – my continued interest and participation in the theatre will only happen because I don’t know how to do much of anything else. I’ve been on stage since the age of 8, and I really never learned any other skills besides teaching and doing theatre. And there’s really not much more for me to pivot to at my age. What you’ll be reading will be a purging of a life spent in an art form that has lost its cultural relevance. In a sense, I think it’s time to say goodbye and godspeed.  -twl

Posted by poorplayer in All Posts, Entropy Chronicles, North of Sixty, Theatre

EST

a leafless lake view:
time changes – everything! –
now is not always

Posted by poorplayer in All Posts, Haiku

daily news

pickups parked dockside
they smoke, sip coffee, and read
obituaries

Posted by poorplayer in All Posts, Haiku

falling down

The light breezes sigh –
A shower of bright golden leaves
This autumn moment

Posted by poorplayer in All Posts, Haiku
Yankee Fandom

Yankee Fandom

Dunkirk NY – I follow this blog primarily to read Hart Seely’s writing, whose prose style I enjoy. I don’t comment because, generally speaking, the comment section has a devoted clique that tends towards the negative – everything always sucks. So I would like to make the following observation: Yankee fans display a great deal of passion but too little rationality. In my time as a fan, I know the game has changed, and I have changed my expectations accordingly. But too many fans, I fear, do not.

I read in the NY Times the other day a column containing a story about G.K. Chesterton. When the Times of London asked of its readers the general question “What is wrong with the world today?”, Mr. Chesterton responded, “Dear Sirs, I am.” Mr. Chesterton’s point was that, before we start blaming the problems of the world on others, we should check in with ourselves first. I think, as we ponder the problems of the Yankees, we should take this ASB to check in with ourselves as well.

I have found I’ve had to change my expectations of the NY Yankees in proportion to the changes in the game. As a boy, I do not recall having expectations of the Yankees to win a championship every year. They just seemed to do that. It was George M. Steinbrenner, a man I came to despise, who, over his years of misrule, set the now-unreasonable expectation that every year was a failure if we didn’t go to the World Series, and a failure if we got there and did not win. This concept, in the modern game, is unreasonable, and died with the 2009 championship.

Yet it seems the average Yankee fan cannot get over this ideological hump. This “World Series or bust” garbage is the last vestige of the G. Steinbrenner years that must be jettisoned, and the sooner the better. It’s the same kind of mentality we see in our society today that makes our national political discourse an intellectual cesspool. Mr. Steinbrenner was never at all interested in making the Yankees #1. He was only interested in making himself Public Celebrity #1, and he used the Yankees to do that. He was a rich bully who never wanted the spotlight to shine on anyone but himself. A convicted felon who had to be suspended from daily baseball operations, he poisoned the Yankee environment as CO2 emissions poison the air we breathe.

More than being a Yankee fan, I am a baseball fan. I came of age with the losing records of 65-67 and 1969. I think it’s great that I am a fan of a team that hasn’t had a losing record since 1982. I’m amazed that the Yankees have missed the playoffs only 4 times since 1995. The game has changed so much since then, and every change has added a new layer of difficulty to achieving success. Yet here we are, at the All Star Break of 2023, with a winning record of 49-42, and a reasonable chance of making the playoffs yet again. And people still complain.

I’ve changed my expectations for the Yankees from those Mr. G. Steinbrenner relentlessly beat into us during his megalomaniacal reign of terror. Even when the team looks as bad as it is, my mind reels at the fact that the Yankees have a winning record in a division where every team has a winning record! I want to suggest that, as Mr. Chesterton so humbly observed about himself, that what’s wrong with the Yankee world is, perhaps, not the Yankees, but we the fans. There’s no one out there to make us check into our own expectations but ourselves. Perhaps, given all the changes in the game over the years since Mantle and Maris pursued the Babe’s home run record, we need to re-set the bar, jettison the poison fed to us by King George, and enjoy the game and the season as it unfolds. Is this team flawed? Yes. Does this team and organization need changes? Yes. Will it be a complete and unmitigated disaster, a failure, if we don’t make the playoffs? No. That’s baseball, Suzyn. And it’s great. -twl

Posted by poorplayer in All Posts, The Joy of Baseball

RIP Gerry Maher

Gerry and me – Romeo and Juliet 2015

Dunkirk NY – Yesterday I attended the memorial for one of the finest actors – and finest people – I’ve ever known. If ever there was a person who fully embodied the Stanislavski quote “There are no small parts; only small actors,” it was Gerry. He was no small actor. He turned every role he ever got into a masterpiece. There was nothing small about Gerry: not his roles, not his talent, not his heart. You might get me to concede he was small in stature, but that only made everything else about him seem that much bigger.

As Henry IV in Henry IV, Part 2

I cannot recall exactly when I first met Gerry, but my first strong recollection of him was in the audition session for the production of Henry IV Part 2 that I directed for Shakespeare in Delaware Park in 1999. He spoke the language eloquently, with a clear affection for it. He was not someone I had initially conceived of for the part of Bolingbroke/Henry IV, but there was something about his bearing on stage that echoed Henry IV as an older man, years apart from the person who deposed Richard II. “Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown” is the last line of Henry IV’s opening monologue, and it seemed to be living in Gerry. So I cast him in the role, and he, of course, delivered, as he always did. His embodiment of an older king, regretful of his past, worn down by his obligations, and concerned for his seemingly miscreant son, was exactly what I wanted, without clearly knowing it at the time.

From that point on we developed a great friendship, one steeped in a friendly rivalry. Both of us are character actors, and often we were up for the same roles, but he always had so much more “character.” Gerry had a far more interesting character face that I’ve ever had. It looked like a face that had been dragged through 100 miles of bad road. He had a craggy look, with character lines on top of character lines. And he could turn that face into a thousand different emotions, from the sorrows of an old man whose life had been hard, to the impish joy of a sly devil who just pulled a fast one on you. I always thought he was the re-incarnation of the famous Irish actor Barry Fitzgerald. His mastery of Irish dramatic literature was well-known in Buffalo, and as I learned yesterday, he appeared in 45 productions at the Irish Classical Theatre Company in Buffalo, several of them as the classic Irish character down on his luck whose ambition was always just a little out of his reach.

Trinculo/Sebastian -The Tempest 2008

Trinculo/Sebastian – The Tempest 2008

He was a fan favorite at Shakespeare in Delaware Park as well. Perhaps our biggest “rivalry” was who could play the Gravedigger best. We’d have a good time throwing barbs at each other after seeing one another’s performance of the role. We failed, however, to achieve our shared dream of playing the two gravediggers together, alternating Gravedigger 1 and 2 each night. But we did have great fun playing Sebastian/Trinculo in The Tempest, and Pistol/Fluellen in Henry V. I think he enjoyed just a little too much giving me that leek to bite into every night in that show.

What went unspoken at his memorial, however, and which was a love shared by us both that went beyond the theatre, was our mutual love of baseball. Gerry was born in Philadelphia, and was a die-hard fan of the Phillies, dating back to the Whiz Kids era. I grew up with Mantle and Maris and the NY Yankees, so we both had baseball memories that stretched far into the past. He didn’t much like the Yankees, but he didn’t hold that against me. After a time we got into the habit of wishing each other a Happy Opening Day as each new baseball season began. During the 2009 World Series, which featured the NY Yankees against the Philadelphia Phillies, we spent the entire series texting with each other as the games were played. Last year, when the Phillies played against the cheating Houston Astros, I lent him my full support, became a temporary Philly Phanatic, and texted with him as the games were played and I ducked in and out of rehearsal to check the score. My final communication with him was just this past April, as the Yankees opened the season with their second series against the Phillies. The Yankees took that early series, two games to one. We texted a bit, and of course I had to get his opinion about the pitch clock, which he did not like at all. Here’s his response:

You can watch on YouTube game 7 of the 1952 WS (Yanks Dodgers) and to a man no hitter stepped out of the batter’s box between pitches. It was and should be the way the game is played. Fuck rules that screw with the game’s natural rhythm. Television took care of that. I think I mean that “they” keep trying to make it a TV sport when it just ain’t.

He had a deep respect for the timelessness of the game, its rhythms and flow – a reverence that matched my own. It was the last message I received from him – classic Gerry.

It’s rare to find someone in life who shares the same depth of passion for the things you revere as well. Gerry’s passion for the theatre and its rituals, and baseball and its beauty, were what we shared together. I shall miss Gerry tremendously. The knowledge that I’ll never see him on the stage again, or work with him in a show again, or text “Happy Opening Day” to him again, weighs heavy on my spirit. The greatest hardship of getting older is not the aches and pains of the body, but rather the heartaches of the soul as, one by one, you begin to lose those deep friendships that matter, knowing that they can never be replaced. My solace will lie in the fact that, when I come to work at the Irish Classical Theatre Company again in 2024, I will be able to see the ghost light that was gifted to the theatre in Gerry’s memory. It’s a fitting tribute to a man whose light shone on so many others and gave to them the gift of theatrical joy. To paraphrase Stanislavski, “There are no small lives; just small people.” Gerry’s life was a shining example of how all of us should live, taking whatever smallness we have measured against the vastness of this dark universe, and giving it a great bright light.  -twl

Posted by poorplayer in All Posts, North of Sixty, The Joy of Baseball

Too Big to Solve

Dunkirk NY – In the mid-70s, AML’s sister’s husband was diagnosed with lung cancer. When they brought him to the hospital to attempt to diagnose the extent of the cancer, they opened him up, took a look, and closed him right back up. The tumor was already too large and entangled in too many other areas in the lungs and body. He died shortly after.

We face the same sort of situation in today’s society. All the issues that are straining at our societal infrastructures and norms have become too big to solve, and are so deeply entangled within the web of our culture that we cannot truly get in there and extract or solve them. Even if you were to consider all the advances in medical science that we have to fight cancer now as compared to the mid-70s, cancer inevitably wins.

Every societal issue you can think of in the 21st century has now become too large to solve. Add to that the tendency of people to hang on to the past as well as protect what they consider their own self-interest, and you have a highly potent mix of human forces that will insure that social entropy continues unabated.

Take transportation. The entire transportation infrastructure is so massive today that thinking about any path to a solution becomes impossible. Legislative mandates will raise issues of freedom of choice. Efforts to move from internal combustion engines to electric vehicles will be met with strong opposition from fossil fuel companies. The idea of modernizing, repairing and restoring the nation’s passenger rail system (Amtrak) will cost an exorbitant amount of money. Alternative means of transportation within major cities is, again, too expensive; people do not want to see their taxes raised to support these kinds of initiatives. Even worse, they do not want to see other parts of the national budget – namely, defense – have their funds re-allocated to help solve these problems.

Recently I read about a study done on Long Island that crystallized this idea very well. There is a massive affordable housing shortage on LI. Houses are too expensive, and the pool of buyers with the means to buy a house has dwindled. A recent poll indicated that a majority of LI residents agree that the need for more housing exists, and favor building more housing. But when you suggest that the housing needed has to be multifamily dwellings, apartments, or anything other than a single-family home, the majority of those polled were against all those solutions. It’s a common thread in American society: yes, I want that problem solved, but no, not at my expense.

In my neck of the woods, the same mentality exists. There are companies in the region trying to develop solar and wind power. At every turn, whenever a new proposal is brought forward to a local town board, there is strong opposition. The most recent opposition has been to offshore wind turbines in Lake Erie. The main point brought up in opposing wind turbines is that they will spoil the view. If you were to ask them where they expect to get clean, non-polluting power 50 years from now, they have no true answer. 50 years from now is not their problem. They prefer to see the status quo maintained, and carbon emissions continue to pollute the atmosphere, rather than spoil their view.

And this might be the greatest problem in terms of a problem too big to solve – changing how people think. Psychologically, people are not wired to think about issues or problems beyond their own personal death. And, naturally speaking, there is no reason that they should. Inevitably, when you see people dig in against a particular proposal, it’s because it represents some aspect of change to their current mode of existence. We need housing, yes, but don’t build an apartment complex here. We need power, yes, but build the solar farm where I can’t see it. We need to get people out of ICE cars and into EVs, but don’t take away my pickup truck that I seldom use for what it’s designed for. We need better public transportation, but make sure the people from the poor side of town can’t easily get to my neighborhood. And on and on.

The biggest contributor to societal entropy and the eventual breakdown of social norms and rules will be this inability to change humanity’s point of view from one of selfish self-concern to one of mutual support and co-existence. While humans have been wired to survive at all costs, they’ve also been given the ability to reason and modify their behavior, and to think beyond their own personal existence. Finding the balance between present self-preservation and future sustainability will be extremely difficult, and perhaps the biggest problem too large to solve.  -twl

Posted by poorplayer in All Posts, Entropy Chronicles

The Entropy Chronicles

Dunkirk NY – As the US House of Representatives merrily continues to shit in its own bed, I thought to myself, “What better day to start a new category of blog posts than the second anniversary of the January 6, 2021 Insurrection at the US Capital?” I’m going to call these series of posts The Entropy Chronicles. As with all my writing efforts on this blog, entries will be as the spirit moves me. I find that in retirement I prefer to take on activities either as the spirit moves me, or as I am absolutely required to do so.

Why “The Entropy Chronicles”? A definition of entropy is in order. From Wikipedia:

Entropy is a scientific concept, as well as a measurable physical property, that is most commonly associated with a state of disorder, randomness, or uncertainty.

Or, put another way:

Energy exists in one of two states. Either usable, or not usable. Entropy is the measurement of how much usable energy there is. The level of entropy within a closed system increases as the level of unusable energy increases (and also obviously, as the level of usable energy decreases).

Even though the energy cannot be destroyed, it gradually becomes obsolete and useless over time as entropy increases. Entropy cannot be reversed (bold emphasis mine) (https://discover.hubpages.com/education/What-is-Entropy-The-laws-of-thermodynamics)

In short, entropy usually measures the state of disorder or chaos within some sort of system. The higher the level of entropy that exists, the less capable the system is of functioning. This particular series of posts will offer instances and commentary on the signs of entropy in the culture, and what they mean for a declining civilization. This is often called “social entropy,” and is a new but inexact social theory.

All organic and human enterprises eventually fade away and die. Whatever it is that we now cherish – or say we cherish – will in time fade away. As a concept, entropy explains this reality. Simply put, an organism runs out of energy to maintain its function. Outside the realm of science, in areas like politics or economics or sociology, the term “entropy” is a bit more symbolic because it is harder to measure precisely or with any great accuracy. Within society, the will to maintain a particular social structure decreases over time until there is no interest or capability left to maintain that social structure.

As I observe things or events that seem to me to be a marker of the entropic forces around us, I will write about them here. I won’t always be right, but in the overall scheme of things, there is little question that we, as a culture, are on the downhill side of things. Social ties that have bound us together in the past, shared meanings and principles of truth, are all crumbling around us. I can’t say where these forces will take us. I can only observe them and point them out for your consideration. There is no judgement here, because I believe all these forces are natural. Nature itself is one big cycle of creation, growth, decay, and extinction. The Entropy Chronicles will be my attempt to observe and notate those events I see as being part of the decay and extinction part of the process. -twl

Posted by poorplayer in All Posts, Entropy Chronicles

On This Rainy Day

Dunkirk NY – I had thought over the past two days that I might write a baseball essay, something on the state of the Yankees at the mid-point of the hot stove season. But after watching the Monday Night Football game on January 2, 2023 between the Buffalo Bills and Cincinnati Bengals, wherein Damar Hamlin, a 24-year-old backup safety for the Bills, playing due to an injury to starter Micah Hyde, suffered a death-threatening injury, it seemed more appropriate, on this rainy day with AML still laid up, to write about why I seldom watch football anymore.

It’s my bad luck to live in the Buffalo region, where the Bills reign supreme. Not to be able to discuss the Bills’ season is tantamount to having nothing to talk about (of course, there’s always the snow in a pinch). The Bills are the pinnacle of culture in the area, and the so-called “Bills Mafia” is known nationally. So I keep tabs on the Bills for the sake of having the ability to make small talk about them when the occasion requires it.

But I am not the football fan I was back in the 60s and 70s. Although I grew up in the NY metropolitan area, I became a Dallas Cowboys fan, partly because I went through a quick “Western” phase of my life as a teenager, and partly because I admired “Bullet” Bob Hayes, billed as the “fastest man alive.” Speed was my one great skill as an athlete, and Bob Hayes had come to the Cowboys from a track and field career where he had won Olympic Gold in the 100m dash. I watched the Dallas Cowboys to watch Bob Hayes do his thing, and that carried over into becoming a fan of the team under Tom Landry. But now, under Jerry Jones, the Cowboys are something of a clown show, and as they became “America’s Team,” I dropped out and became less and less a fan of both the team and the sport.

The phenomenon that finally turned me away from the game, however, is what I call the “cult of celebration.” It is now common in the NFL for players to celebrate every single thing that happens on the football field. Get a first down, celebrate. Get a touchdown, celebrate. Hit a player especially hard, celebrate. But the most galling celebrations of all are the ones that come after hard and punishing hits by defensive players. The sack of a quarterback calls for shows of strength by flexing arm muscles, growls, screams of fierce pleasure, and all other sorts of displays of “emotions.” It is expected. It is not conceivable to fans or players alike these days for a lineman who has just sacked a quarterback to get up, perhaps adjust a helmet or pad, and simply walk back to the huddle, having accomplished his objective. The requisite intimidating gestures and rituals must be performed, intended to show the opponent (but mostly the crowd) how fierce and tough the player is.

To me, it is the fact that attention and praise is heaped upon those who commit the fiercest violence that is at the heart of what’s wrong with the NFL as a sport. The hypocrisy on display right now by all concerned is blatant. You can’t have it both ways: you can’t glorify the vicious hits, the level of injuries, the crippling aftermath that happens to retired players later in life such as CTE or other debilitating conditions, and then turn around and feel bad for one player whose heart stopped while on the field of play, and lies in critical condition in a hospital. If the NFL, its players, and its fans are truly serious in their concern for Mr. Hamlin, then they all should immediately cease the mindless celebration of the violence inherent in the game.

Football is a violent game, and if you choose to play it or watch it, all well and good. But the excessive glorification and celebration of the violence is unnecessary. The game was a fine game when Bob Hayes played it. The violence was there, but not unduly celebrated. I don’t remember Bob Lily or Jethro Pugh or Randy White ever performing excessive displays of celebration while they played. It’s a mindset that only feeds on itself and demands ever-increasing attempts to top that last hit. Eliminating the celebration of the inherent violence in football lies at the root of creating a mindset where the game can be played well and skillfully, but without any undue reveling in the violence.

Posted by poorplayer in All Posts, North of Sixty, The Joy of Baseball

2023 and Me

Dunkirk NY – I’m not one to make resolutions. At my age, resolutions are rather pointless. As Popeye used to say, “I yam what I yam,” and for the foreseeable future I don’t see that changing all that much.

This doesn’t mean there aren’t things I can’t change. As I look forward to 2023, there are a couple of things I see changing. In no particular order, here they are:

  • I believe my active acting career has come to an end. I do not foresee any theatrical opportunities coming my way, and I don’t intend to search for any. I simply think my time is up. As an old white male, the current theatrical zeitgeist has no use for me; and to be perfectly candid, I have no use for it. I have nothing really useful to contribute to the current political and social justice conversations taking place, so I believe the best thing I can actually contribute is to step away and let others have their opportunity to create the theatre they want to see. I’ve had my fun, I’ve had a good career and a good run, and now it’s time to let others have their careers and fun (although I think theatre as “fun” has all but disappeared; it’s all too serious at the moment). This is NOT to say I might not consider a fantastic opportunity should it materialize. In this business I don’t think you ever actually, completely “retire.” But on the whole, it looks like the end has arrived. I’m OK with this.
  • I will be looking for more creative opportunities in the following areas:
    • Podcasting. I enjoy doing my podcast for the 1891 Fredonia Opera House, but I’d like to do at least one more that has more of my own interests and concerns at heart.
    • Local theatre. If I do any theatre at all, it’s probably going to be of a local nature. And my preference will be to direct, not act.
    • Writing. I’d like to get this blog a bit more active (doesn’t every blogger say that on New Year’s Day?). To do this, I have to get over the psychological hump I have about “having something to say.” I think I need to leave that more to the reader, and perhaps change my perspective to “having something someone wants or needs to hear.” I would like to write a short book on acting, as I believe the Stanisalvski method is not ideal for the 21st century anymore. I’d also like to write more haikus. To do this, I need to get out more.
    • Get moving. I am not a workout freak by any means, but I need to get out more and get moving. The pandemic had me walking a lot more, but as other situations that needed my attention came about, I lost the rhythm and routine. I need to re-capture that this year. 30 minutes of walking at least every other day should not be this hard to build into the day.
    • Traveling. I am not at this point what that might mean. As AML’s foot continues to heal, most thoughts about traveling will have to take into account how much she is capable of doing. I do not think international travel is on the horizon yet. Travel is always difficult because the worst thing about traveling is the actual traveling. I do not like the process involved in getting on flights and flying; everything about it completely sucks, and serves as a discouragement against traveling. But perhaps next year things will ease off a bit, or I just might have to suck it up and take one of those pre-arranged tours. Maybe at my age they are not so bad after all.
  • I have to spend some time considering where I want to spend the final years of my life. Right now, and for the next few years at least, where I am is fine. But it will not be fine in another 7-10 years. There are a lot of factors to consider, and unfortunately the final decision will no doubt involve a lot of compromise. This is all in the nature of long-term planning, but at this point, 5 to 10 years is now considered long term

I think that’s about it for now. AML won’t be out of a restrictive leg device until around St. Patrick’s Day, and in the meantime I’ll be mostly in the house attending to her needs, cooking meals, doing wash, etc. It will be dull, but there is no escape from it. Generally speaking, I am hoping that 2023 will be able to offer a bit more freedom in my life, a bit more of doing what I’d like to do, and less of doing things I am obligated to do. And perhaps that’s the 2023 goal in a nutshell: more freedom, less obligation. -twl

Posted by poorplayer in All Posts, North of Sixty, retirement, Theatre